Opening reception Feb 4, 2011 7-11pm
Closing reception Feb 27, 2011 11am-3pm
Paintings by Benson Simmonds
Blue Five Art Space
2935 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA
Benson Simmonds believes all good art comes from the soul and has the power to create a new world. The Soular Power series and handbook were developed to awaken the power of the soul by teaching Jews and others to resist a reactive lifestyle and embrace a positive proactivity.
The premise of the book is that we all are born with two operating systems. Our default operating system—the one we are locked into if we don’t choose otherwise—is our ego based in fears and limitations. It’s a drive for self-preservation that doesn’t mind who gets hurt along the way. The ego message is that we are not enough and that there is and will never be enough. The paradox of the ego is that drive for self-preservation is exactly what kills us years before our time, because it puts so much stress on us emotionally and physically.
The other operating system is our Soular system, the system of our soul, which is a drive based on joy, love and expansion. The paradox of the soular system is that when we stop and simply say, “I’m enough, this moment is enough” it is exactly when we allow more divine light in to accomplish our goals. As Jews we live to be a light unto the nations by learning to transform fear, lack and limitation into joy, love and expansion.
The book includes many tools to help us make that shift so we can proactively create our own world and not be helpless reactive victims to the world. It is art to awaken the soular power and live in infinite joy, love and expansion 24/7.
In addition to opening and closing receptions for the show, there will also be a singles event February 14th. As Simmonds puts it, “I’m also planning to attract my true soul mate.”
By David Sperber | Tweet
It is commonly believed that the Jewish world of the past was devoid of aesthetics, and that visual creation was not an integral part of it, at least until the modern period. This claim is partially true, but the sweeping generalization distorts the real picture. In fact, the assumption derives from the antisemitic opinion which was so pervasive in Europe, namely, that Jews are defective human beings, victims of their living conditions, and in bondage to their books; hence, they lack the strength to create art. This was claimed, for instance, by German composer Richard Wagner, in his essay “Judaism in Music” (published in 1850 under a pseudonym and again in 1869, this time under the author’s full name). This perception was internalized by early Zionist thinkers and was expressed, for example, by philosopher Martin Buber.
Jewish culture, by its very nature, engages in rituals that form part of Jewish daily life; consequently, many types of culture-adapted utensils and objects were created over time. Although these are usually categorized as Judaica craft rather than fine art, these designs in fact prominently manifest aesthetic principles grounded in the spirit of a given time and place. In modern times too, as noted by Kalman Bland in his study The Artless Jew, Jewish thinkers did not deny visual presentation yet neither did they succumb to modernist constructs of art as a religion unto itself.
A clear trend can be discerned in contemporary Jewish creativity: making use of Judaica motifs and objects by subjecting them to defamiliarization and integrating them into the general context of contemporary art. A noteworthy stream engaging in these practices merits the name “Judaica Twist”. Since the late 1960’s, and even more so during the 1980’s, Judaica objects have assumed a significant place in the work of Jewish artists in Israel and abroad. Note: Judaica, not necessarily Yiddishkeit. In contemporary art, these objects often suggest radical, subversive motives intertwined with important art-theoretical issues.
The “Judaica turn”, as the move was termed by art historian Yael Guilat, includes both the use of Judaica motifs and objects as well as their defamiliarization within the more general context in which they are inserted. In this context, a poetics of visual representation is inseparable from politics of cultural and gender identity. This reading of the works challenges the very notion of high culture by presenting popular culture as art. Ritual objects are customarily regarded as popular, folkloristic culture, yet now, instead of imbuing them with sanctity, they are subjected to critical representation.
The practice of integrating motifs from traditional Judaica into contemporary artworks creates new objects, which then enter into a dialogue with the traditional object and displace it from its original ritual function to the domain of art. It is easy to perceive this practice in today’s folklore theory, striving as it does for multivocity and empowerment of the non-canonical. Thus, alongside enriching canonical discourse by illuminating aspects of popular culture and relocating them to the center, visibility is ensured to what, by its very nature, is not defined: that which remains in flux between different fields and demands redefinition time after time.
The new trend of integrating Judaica objects and motifs into the art world is inseparably linked to changes that have taken place in the world of Judaica itself. In fact, from the early 1930’s on, the production of Jewish ritual objects was dominated by a modernist tendency toward clean, simple and functional design. However, in the 1980’s, a postmodernist move appeared, characterized, as noted for example by Haya Friedberg, by creators seeking to impart meaning to the utensil and the impression it evokes, rather than to its functional design. Judaica objects are thus in flux too; no longer mere utensils for practical use, they now become objects generating a way of life and its symbols of identity.
This trend naturally distanced and differentiated its products from the Jewish aesthetic tradition of the past. Moreover, the move dissipated the pervasive tension between ritual object and art object. Indeed, many artists now explicitly address the interface of religio-cultural practices and art, with their work blurring the dividing line between the disciplines: the accepted distinction between ritual object and artwork loses its meaning.
In fact, the acknowledged dichotomy of practical object / art object had never been absolute; contemporary works are often set up as a postmodernist, practical alternative to the traditional object, or, alternatively, as a new ritual object, suited to its period and culture.
The “Judaica Twist”, then, is less revolution than continuation of existing practices, for Jewish visual creativity has always engaged in product design – of ceremonial objects and culture-adapted utensils. Adopting highly-charged icons, and questioning symbolic and aesthetic taboos and assumptions, can likewise be regarded as inherent to Jewish visual creativity of the past. In fact, halakhic discussions of problems raised by an ever-changing reality and its needs have yielded a variety of halakhic solutions – from the Shabbat clock to the eruv (circumscribing the area in which carrying is permitted on the Sabbath) to shemitta (fallow year) laws, including fictive sale of the land to a gentile.
Product design is another area engaging the aesthetics and poetics of self-renewing halakha. Different artists flirt with testing the boundaries of halakhic rulings; however, a closer examination of their work will often reveal a keen interest in halakhic concepts and criteria, as well as profound insights into the nature of Jewish law.
But we should not confuse this trend with what is happening in Israeli art in general. “Judaica Twist” is a lively, subversive field with some overlap with the way Jewish themes are generally treated in Israeli art. Yet, despite some similarities, canonical Jewish art in Israel generally takes a provocative stance and challenges the very validity of tradition.
– Translated from the Hebrew by Sara Friedman
By David Brook
By SUDINmag | Tweet
Thursday, January 27, 2011
5pm-1am
at
320 Studios
320W 37th st, 14th floor
New York, NY, 10018
The second installation of the Contrast Art Show; an art exhibition which puts together a variation of artists, artistic movement groups, and several upcoming galleries in an attempt to show the rising trend of art in New York City.
The participants include members of groups such as: the Pudding Factory Art Collective, The New York Art Page, The Art Society for the Advancement of the Spine, the Marketplace Gallery, SUDINmagazine and The American Art Gallery; all together coming in at upwards of 20 artists.
Helping to oversee the exhibition will be John Stavros the Owner of PMP Studios at his new event space 320 Studios, an old friend of Andy Warhol’s and the first art director/promoter of studio 54. On his part Mr. Stavros will exhibit more original work from Antonio Lopez, as well as a special rendition of His Body parts from the Warhol years, done by Ocean Clark. Additionally, 320 studios will present a live body painting performance, as well as a show in “painting as a study of ambydexterity†presented by Richmond transplant, Roman Zelgatas, adding to the kick off for the show.
For other information on the show or any of the groups involved please contact Rustam Davletshin at 201 707 2701, or send an e-mail to rustamdavletshin@gmail.com For more details on the space check out www.320studiosnyc.com
A celebration of the upcoming Punk Jews documentary series. Four breakthrough Jewish artists take the stage who exemplify this new movement of smashing stereotypes and breaking down boundaries. Be our guest for dancing, screenings, and raffles to help us kick off the project with an evening you won’t soon forget.
Wed Jan 26th 2011
@ Drom (85 Ave A btw 5th & 6th, NYC)
8pm
$15
Performances by Y-Love, DeLeon, Kosha Dillz, Diwon, and the Amazing Amy Yoga Yenta
$4 drink specials from L’Chaim Vodka from 8pm-9pm
Plus a short screening of never before seen footage from the documentary
We’ll also be having tons of raffle giveaways and brand new Punk Jews t-shirts and buttons for sale.
Co-sponsored by Shemspeed
Additional sponsors: He’brew Beer, DrinkCoffee, Dveykus, Museum at Eldridge Street, Pardes Restaurant, Providence Day Spa, Party Innovations
By Matthue Roth | Tweet
Jerusalem’s Association of Planning and Conservation posed the question to the world: What will Jerusalem look like in 100 years? A bunch of filmmakers, both amateur and professional, entered the Assocation’s “Jerusalem 2111″ competition.
Here’s the winning entry, “Secular Quarter #3,†by David Gidali and Itay Gross. It’s bizarre and disturbing and sort of beautiful.
We’ve decided to publish some of our favorite entries as well. Here’s one about a flying Jerusalem — it’s a cross between a travel guide and the second half of “The Empire Strikes Backâ€:
This one takes place in the Arab Shuk, which might be the most photogenic place ever. Just seeing it makes me want to eat fresh fruit and get my hair cut.
The weirdest of the flock, hands down. This one, I have no words for. Except to tell you to keep watching till the end. There’s no specific reason that it should take place in 2111, except…oh, just watch it.
Post thanks to Jewniverse
By SUDINmag | Tweet
Just download and cutout and you can have your own G-d is in the details torah cursor!
Check out more at www.kengoldmanart.com
By Saul Sudin | Tweet
Eve Annenberg, USA, 2010; 91m
The Jewish film world is starved for new ideas to emerge. Just as Ava (The film’s writer/director Eve Annenberg) is tasked with updating an early-20th Century Yiddish version of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet for a modern Yiddish-speaking audience, so too it seems that Jewish cinema is stuck retreading the same concepts and stories. Sure, they may be classics, but just as Ava questions in the film, why do it? Who would go see such a production besides your elderly grandparent or the rare Yiddish speaking Hassid who wouldn’t object to the content? Thankfully, Romeo and Juliet in Yiddish goes beyond this premise to deliver much more than the title simply suggests and in a multi-layered Meta way manages to subtly address the past, present and future of Jewish life at home, on the stage and in film.
Ava is introduced by real life Chulent group organizer Isaac Schoenfeld to a trio of ex-Hassidic young men whose lives consist of running quick scams and bunking in the back of a rented U-Haul truck. Over time a friendly relationship develops between the boys and Ava as she skeptically lets them into her apartment and life and she begins to teach them about Shakespeare. Lazer (Lazer Weiss) is a troubled ex-Satmar Hassid living on the fringes of this closeted community in Williamsburg, Brooklyn who doesn’t believe that love really exists. How could he when he has had a failed marriage and a family that refuses to talk to him? Evident of the humor and shtick prevalent throughout the film, he naturally becomes our Romeo when scenes of Yiddish-language Shakespeare (with subtitles) begin edging in through an alternate reality as Lazer reads it for the first time.
What is refreshing to see is a more authentic representation of Hassidic life than is typically seen in cinema (Holy Rollers being a recent example of blatant inaccuracies). Instead of Capulets and Montagues, the warring families become Satmar and Chabad-Lubavitch Hassidim, two sects of the Hassidic Jewish world who speak differing dialects of Yiddish and could scarcely have more opposing ideologies for belonging to the same form of Judaism. While Satmars typically stay within their close-knit community and shun interacting at length with the outside world, Chabad believes in establishing themselves anywhere in the world that has a Jewish presence and will actively seek to find Jews who may be living under the radar. Though both groups may dress predominantly in black and white clothing, their hats especially define which sect they are, and the biggest difference in appearance may be the Satmar’s long Payos (side curls) and Chabad’s lack of them. So it seems quite against expectation that while the Satmars are portrayed in possibly the most realistic way seen yet on film (complete with mostly believable Payos on actors who cut their real ones off years ago), Chabad are shown inaccurately as too liberal.
Juliet (Melissa Weisz), is a Chabadnik, though she is shown wearing a sleeveless dress, which goes against rules of modesty that even those in Chabad who dress in modern styles follow. On the whole the Chabad life is shown without much detail, so there is little to grasp from the film but it just feels off. On the whole, Juliet and her real-world counterpart Faigie are underwritten and given too little screen time which at times makes it feel like “Romeo and Ava in Yiddish (plus Juliet)â€. One big aspect we do see of her and Chabad life is a purim party, which traditionally is a masquerade holiday, one of several cleverly utilized combinations with the source material. Among the song, dance and sneakiness of being Satmars at a Chabad party (“We’re only dressed as Satmars for Purimâ€, they dubiously claim) Romeo catches a glimpse of Juliet from beyond the Mechitzah (a partition separating men and women at religious events) and they share an out of reality pre-marital kiss.
And yet, back in the non-Shakespearian scenes the life of ex-Satmars are shown with a stark authenticity as of yet unseen in the movies. While they mock Ava for her low-cut blouses and short skirts, Lazer and his friends have no trouble with stealing, doing hard drugs, sleeping with random women, or in the case of Mendy (Mendy Zafir)- being gay. It’s sort of a kitchen sink of the types of vices that many ex-Hassidim get involved with when bounding away from their communities, but the film doesn’t handle them with a heavy hand. Quite the contrary as in most cases they are successfully played for laughs. Truthfully it is a brilliant move to handle such a hot topic in this fashion because it opens discourse without being judgmental.
Lazer Weiss is surprisingly good for a non-professional actor, and he truly carries the film. He is called upon to express a wide range of emotions, as well as pull off comedy and romance and does so in a believable way that elevates the movie to a place beyond the sometimes amateur technical aspects that conversely represent the worst the film has to offer. Whereas RAJIY’s fellow entry in the 20th New York Jewish Film Festival Mahler on the Couch was full of sound and fury signifying nothing, this film offers a tremendous amount of social comedy and humor held back only by the limited budget. Possibly as a result of this “on the street†charm, RAJIY has been described as the first Yiddish “mumblecore†film but I would argue that there is tremendously more fantasy in this film than that genre typically allows, though it does fall in line with the plethora of non-actors involved.
Knowing that a straight Romeo and Juliet production for the Yiddish stage would probably be widely ignored, Eve Annenberg has done a wonderful job of managing many stories and layers in this film, likely educating secular audiences about Hassidim and Hassidic audiences about Shakespeare. Romeo and Juliet in Yiddish is rousing, funny, and has a lot to say about the lives of a growing culture of wandering ex-Hassidim. As they say in the film, “You’re Jewish– you should like itâ€. Now if only we could get support for more inventive narrative movies like this in the Jewish world.
Romeo and Juliet in Yiddish is currently playing in the 20th Annual New York Jewish Film Festival at Lincoln Center’s Walter Reade Theater, and will have an encore screening on Wednesday, January 26th.
The festival, presented by The Jewish Museum and the Film Society of Lincoln Center, runs January 12th – 27th, 2011.
For a complete schedule of films and to purchase tickets, visit http://filmlinc.com/wrt/onsale/nyjff.html
IN SHORT
Submission Deadline – February 28 ,2011
Grand opening and Jurors Choice Award presentation – April 4th, 2011
Address – Holy Blossom Temple, 1950 Bathurst Street , Toronto ON
Download Entry Form
CONCEPT
A juried art exhibition presenting 30 Jewish artists from all over the world, dealing with the questions: Who am I? Israeli? Jewish? Where do I belong?
The artists will deal with how they see themselves and their Israeli and/or Jewish identity.
ILartTO
This is ILartTO’s first organized art exhibition, open to all Jewish artists around the world.
As part of this exhibition, ILartTO will provide a beautiful catalog of all participating artists and their artwork, advertisement through flyers and local media, and guest artist talks throughout the exhibition.
OUR JUROR
Steven Schwartz, owner and curator of ENGINE GALLERY at the Historic Distillery District, Toronto ON.
Mr. Schwartz studied at the Ontario Collage of Art, and started his career as a commercial artist. In 2003 he founded ENGINE GALLERY, one of the premier galleries to develop the Queen West Art District in Toronto and has now found a permanent home in the Historic Distillery District, and where he represents artists from all around the world. Mr. Schwartz has been participating on the jury panels for shows by the Toronto Society of Artists, the Riverdale Art Walk, and SNAP Auction.
JURORS CHOICE AWARD
Jurors’ Choice Award will be presented during the Grand Opening.
The winner of the Jurors Choice Award will receive a solo show at the ENGINE GALLERY (subject to the gallery’s schedule and availability).
VENUE AND GALLERY HOURS
Holy Blossom Temple , Toronto, ON – The exhibition will take place at the social hall of Holy Blossom Temple, a 150 years congregation, nested in the beautiful neighbourhood of Forest Hill.
Address: 1950 Bathurst Street , Toronto ON (maps and directions)
Gallery Hours
Grand opening – April 4th, 7-10pm
April 7, 11, 12,13,14 , 7-10pm
April 10, 1-5pm
At all other times, the gallery can be viewed by appointment (call 416.789.3291)
Artist Talks
During the exhibition, ILartTO will engage artists to discuss their work with the community.
DATES
Submission Deadline:
February 28 ,2011 at 5 p.m. (no exceptions)
Artists Notified Of Jurors’ Selection:
March 7, 2011 via email
Artists Drop Off Accepted Works:
March 31, 2011. Shipping address will be provided to all accepted artists.
Exhibition Dates:
April 4-14, 2011
Grand Opening:
April 4, 2011, 7-10 PM
Artists Pick Up Works:
For local artists, April 15, 2011, 1-4PM at Holy Blossom Temple.
All other artwork will be shipped back to the artists on artists’ expense. Arrangements must be made in advance.
CONDITIONS OF ENTRY
This exhibition is open to artists 18 years and older who are Jewish. Original 2 -dimensional works including drawing, painting, photography, printmaking, ceramics, wood, paper, textile, fiber, enamels, glass, metalsmithing, collage, and mixed media, completed since January 2009. Crafts, video, kit work, and reproductions are not accepted.
ARTWORK SIZE
Artwork maximum width can be up to 70cm (if artwork is framed, frame included).
ENTRY FEE (for up to 3 works):
First piece: $25.00
Any additional piece: $10
Only one piece will be selected, for 30 artists.
PARTICIPATION FEE
Artists juried for the exhibition will pay $85 in addition to entry fees.
IMAGES
Provide images of artwork via email. Images must be PC compatible, JPEG format. Guidelines for image: 300dpi, max: 7“ X 9“. Each file must be identified by artist’s name and work’s title.
DISPLAY
All selected works must be ready for presentation. Two-dimensional work must be ready to hang with appropriate hardware and wiring installed. If necessary, any special installation instructions must accompany the accepted works.
INSURANCE
ILartTO and The Holy Blossom Temple will not assume liability for loss or damage of artwork during transit or while at the exhibition. Artists may secure their own insurance.
SHIPPING
Artist is responsible for transit of accepted artwork to the Holy Blossom Temple. Accepted work(s) must be shipped in reusable cartons, (no loose packing peanuts). Use screws only in wooden crates.
SALES
ILartTO retains a 15% commission on all sales. Works are not required to be for sale.
EXHIBITION AGREEMENT
By entering the jurying process the artist agrees to have their work available April 3 – April 15 2011 for the duration of the exhibition. The artist grants the organizers permission to photograph works for  publicity, educational and reference purposes.
SELECTED WORK
Entries will be judged on technical merit, aesthetic quality, creativity and how well the subject interprets the concept. All decisions made by the jury panel are final. The jurors reserves the right to disqualify any artwork misrepresented by digital files or work that is not supported by adequate installation mounting and hardware. Fees will not be refunded for all accepted artists, including those whose art is found unsuitable to be used due to the above reasons, or any other reason.
ART NOT SOLD
All works not sold will be returned at the artists’ expense. Artists can pick up their artwork at Holy Blossom Temple, on April 15, 2011, between 1-4PM. Artists who wish their works shipped to them will be sent a quotation for transport from Toronto. Payment must be received prior to the dispatch of the works to the artist. If an artist does not want the work returning it can be donated to ILartTO which can make use of the works in whatever way it deems most suitable. Works will be stored for 15 days after the closure of the exhibition. If no confirmation for the return of the work is received within this time the works will be acquired by ILartTO.
MAIL ENTRY FORM & CHECKS TO (regular mail only, no certified mail please):
ShaKed Kaplan
31 Aikenhead Ave
Richmond Hill, ON L4S 0A8 Canada
SUBMIT ELECTRONIC IMAGES & DOCUMENTS TO:
info@ILartTO.com
QUESTIONS?
Call us at: 416.525.1350
Email us at:Â info@ILartTO.com